<div dir="auto">Hi.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">LIR's don't have influence, because there are some people who decide are there enough money for bloated budget, is it time to implement any restrictions and which voice is good and which one should not be accepted.</div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">ср, 8 июл. 2020 г., 20:55 Gert Doering <<a href="mailto:gert@space.net">gert@space.net</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 07:49:02PM +0300, Max Tulyev wrote:<br>
> I think the root of the problem is RIPE is not enough involved in RIPE <br>
> NCC internal processes. We (as RIPE) should have more influence in RIPE <br>
> NCC procedures and it's development. Please support me anyone if I'm right.<br>
<br>
Paying members of the NCC, aka LIRs, have maximum influence via the<br>
AGM (though it might take a while, and if you have no majorities, stuff<br>
does not happen).<br>
<br>
Besides that, ncc-services *does* work to get NCC irks changed.<br>
<br>
Gert Doering<br>
-- NetMaster<br>
-- <br>
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?<br>
<br>
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer<br>
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann<br>
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)<br>
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
members-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">members-discuss@ripe.net</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.ripe.net/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mailman.ripe.net/</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleksbulgakov%40gmail.com" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleksbulgakov%40gmail.com</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>