<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div dir="auto">Thats a good question...</div><div dir="auto">We have several LIR's too and want to bring all Networks to one single LIR.</div><div dir="auto">Does it mean, that we have to revoke allocations from Customers because we have to reduce our Networks?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Best Regards, </div><div dir="auto">Christian </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div id="composer_signature" dir="auto"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757" dir="auto">Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.</div></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:100%;color:#000000" dir="auto"><div>-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------</div><div>Von: Aleksey Bulgakov <aleksbulgakov@gmail.com> </div><div>Datum: 15.10.19 20:15 (GMT+03:00) </div><div>An: members-discuss@ripe.net </div><div>Betreff: [members-discuss] IPv6 amount for one member </div><div><br></div></div><div dir="auto">Hi, all!<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Earlier I have noticed that the NCC tries to return back IPv6 allocations to free pool if LIR has more than one /29. I understand that /29 is very big, but is there any policy, which denies to keep more than /29 per LIR (including additional accounts)? Or maybe is the IPv6 exhaustion like IPv4? Also the NCC prevents IPv6 transfer to other LIR if the last one already has IPv6.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If you remember, some time ago the NCC required to request IPv6 prior IPv4 request. So, what happens now?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">---</div><div dir="auto">Kind regards,</div><div dir="auto">Alex</div></div> </body></html>