I agree entirely! Too many people are blaming others for their own short sightedness, and frankly it's no one's fault but their own. <div class="gmail_extra"> <div class="gmail_quote">On 22 Sep 2016 10:16 p.m., "Gert Doering" <<a href="mailto:gert@space.net">gert@space.net</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi, On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 06:30:54PM +0000, Network Engineers wrote: > We need to see better hardware support for IPv6 before we work on end-user adoption. It???s hard to build apps at Internet scale when your expensive front-end load balancers don???t support IPv6 in their ASICs. Decide with your wallet. Just do not buy the stuff that cannot do IPv6 - there is enough stuff available today (and has been since many years) that will happily do IPv6 at the same speed as IPv4. For loadbalancers, at least F5 and Citrix Netscaler never had this "IPv6 in software only" tax. (And do not complain *now* that you did not listen to us telling everyone for the last 10+ years that "if you buy new gear, make sure that it will do proper IPv6 when you decide to turn it on, when you're ready") Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 </blockquote></div></div>