<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-western">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/16/2016 05:57 AM, Prager-IT
e.U. wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADHTtzEqtWgykHDzvJmqziA7kYVkAa+KWCJH8U9B_KORXYnWrw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>The plan I envision is quite simple, move from the
current Flatrate charging scheme to a system that charges
members an amount for the resources they are using. This
will ensure that each and every RIPE NCC member will pay
their fair share.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. Charge per allocated IPv4 address with a linear
system.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>price_per_ipv4 = required_budget /
amount_of_addresses_in_use</div>
<div>your_yearly_membership_fee = amount_of_ipv4_you_use *
price_per_ipv4</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Did you happen to read my reply to the thread. This is going to
equate to almost no resources left as a /22 will cost roughly 24
EUR per year. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADHTtzEqtWgykHDzvJmqziA7kYVkAa+KWCJH8U9B_KORXYnWrw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>This will also apply to Provider Independent(PI)
assignemnts, anycasting assignments and Legacy Internet
Resources registered via a sponsoring Local Internet
Registry(LIR).</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
You're going to be hard pressed to charge Legacy resource holders,
BUT, even if you did, my above figure of a /22 costing 24EUR would
probably be cut down to 16 EUR or less<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADHTtzEqtWgykHDzvJmqziA7kYVkAa+KWCJH8U9B_KORXYnWrw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>IPv6 PI assignments and IPv6 IXP assigments will remain
unchanged at 50,-- Euros per year.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Moot point here since the number of IPV6 resources avail. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADHTtzEqtWgykHDzvJmqziA7kYVkAa+KWCJH8U9B_KORXYnWrw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If we ever reach a point where IPv4 becomes obsolete
revert back to a Flatrate System as due to the nature of
IPv6 a Flatrate system is a fair choice.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>2. Increase the Setup Fee to an amount that reflects the
current reality of the transfer market, 6.000,-- Euros.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Read the 2015 Budget, they collected slightly over 5 Million EUR
in setup fee's, which got dispersed back to its members as a
credit on next years bill, increasing the setup fee will simply
act to lower, even further, the yearly cost. In 2015 Each LIR
would have received 'roughly' a 415 EUR credit on their bill... So
we might as well just not charge for IPv4 upto a /19 , and if
you're going to up the setup fee's then we might as well make that
a free /18.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADHTtzEqtWgykHDzvJmqziA7kYVkAa+KWCJH8U9B_KORXYnWrw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>3. Introduce an Inter-RIR Transfer Fee for resources that
leave the RIPE Region so people don't flee with their
resources into a cheaper Region, 3,-- Euros per IPv4
address.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
If you do this, then it's a two way street. Not to mention that in
the growing global age, you can't tell me every IP being routed to
the ripe region is under RIPEs control. By adding additional
hurdles folks will simply ignore, and announce their space
globally from the originating RIR more so than they currently do
now. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADHTtzEqtWgykHDzvJmqziA7kYVkAa+KWCJH8U9B_KORXYnWrw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>4. Buy Back IPv4 resources and return them to the free
pool with any excess money from members that are willing to
give back resources.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
With what money are these bought back and at what price? Only to
re-assign at a financial loss and then have to buy it back again?
Grand scheme of things, everybody here is ignoring the fact that,
with basically 21,000,000 EUR budget to disperse between all LIR's
in RIPE you aren't going to change the world. Aside from a lot of
keyboard warriors pounding away with random ideas that have no
factual backings this thread accomplishes nothing.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADHTtzEqtWgykHDzvJmqziA7kYVkAa+KWCJH8U9B_KORXYnWrw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<p class="gmail-p1">Kind Regards,<br>
Stefan Prager<br>
<br>
--<br>
Prager-IT e.U.<br>
VAT Number: ATU69773505<br>
Austrian Company Register: 438885w</p>
<p class="gmail-p1">Skype: Prager-IT<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:contact@prager-it.com">contact@prager-it.com</a><br>
+43 680 300 99 80<br>
+44 20 376 962 11</p>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">----
If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss
mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/">https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/</a>
Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>