<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div>How about requesting ASN and returning them for credit then?<br>
<br>
<div><font style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); font-size: 13pt;">With Kind Regards,</font><font style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); font-size: 13pt;"> </font></div>
<span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><font>Dominik Nowacki</font><font> </font><font><br>
</font><font> </font><font><br>
</font></span><font><br>
</font></div>
<div><br>
On 29 Mar 2015, at 00:33, Jamie Stallwood <<a href="mailto:Jamie.Stallwood@imerja.com">Jamie.Stallwood@imerja.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<meta name="Generator" content="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7638.1">
<title>Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016</title>
Here's a crazy thought. Instead of trying to raise charges the members aren't keen to accept, why not offer a one-off account credit for returned resources? It might be a nominal amount such as EUR 10, but even a small carrot is better than a stick that you
cannot use. <br>
<br>
Kind regards <br>
Jamie Stallwood <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Jamie Stallwood<br>
Security Specialist<br>
Imerja Limited<br>
<br>
M: 07795 840385<br>
<br>
Sent from mobile secured by Good (<a href="http://www.good.com">www.good.com</a>)<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
<b>From: </b>Nigel Titley [<a href="mailto:nigel@titley.com">nigel@titley.com</a>]<br>
<b>Sent: </b>Saturday, March 28, 2015 10:37 PM GMT Standard Time<br>
<b>To: </b><a href="mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net">members-discuss@ripe.net</a><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016<br>
<br>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format --><br>
<br>
<p><tt><font size="2">On 28/03/15 22:25, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:<br>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:11:35AM +0300, Fahad AlShirawi wrote:<br>
>> NCC gives us an estimate of any costs directly associated with<br>
>> ASN billing, risk assessment if any, and we vote on whether or<br>
>> not we want the NCC to pursue another option in the future that<br>
>> is ASN billing related. Yes?<br>
><br>
> There is nothing to stop the board from proposing a CS option<br>
> with an ASN charge >0 now. Do I understand you correctly in that this<br>
> vote should determine<br>
> whether the NCC will *always* have to present a CS option with<br>
> ASN charge >0 or just for the next CS proposal?<br>
I think it is unwise to bind the NCC/Board for all time (and I don't<br>
actually think this is possible anyway).<br>
<br>
Nigel<br>
<br>
----<br>
If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss<br>
mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page:<br>
<a href="https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/">https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/</a><br>
<br>
Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.<br>
</font></tt></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>----</span><br>
<span>If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss</span><br>
<span>mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page:</span><br>
<span><a href="https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/">https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/</a></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.</span></div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>