<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
IPv4 market should be illegal.<br>
How someone can sell IPv4 address space, if RIPE is allocating
address space based on their needs???<br>
If they sell addresses, RIPE allocated to them more than they need.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/16/2013 10:58 AM, Oliver Bryssau
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAA=G5DacOHcPCBEwEFd7pc_Yex2L2hDQcG=WCOfpn9ruzNKJLA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">Hi All,</p>
<p dir="ltr">I think that post hits the nail on the head
perfectly. </p>
<p dir="ltr">I guess if so many of us feel this way we should
investigate the Ripe framework to see if there is something that
can be done to create positive change. </p>
<p dir="ltr">This would be a great short/medium term solution
however we all must look to support ipv6 natively.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Merry Christmas,<br>
Oliver<br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 16 Dec 2013 09:39, "RIPE" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:ripe@centronet.cz">ripe@centronet.cz</a>>
wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hello,<br>
<br>
everyone who says "IPv4 is gone" is living in his/her dreams,
denying reality and IPv4 market (and those mentioned average 2
letters/IPv4 requests per day). It may be true for some, but
it obviously isn't for others, no matter reasons. While I
understand IPv6 propagation, I don't think that
punishing/discriminating small IPv4 holders in need for a few
more IPs is right. Actually, releasing those big unused IPv4
blocks might have much better impact for IPv6 development,
while the small ones would appreciate "a few more C" and it
may even be enought for a few more months/years this way.<br>
<br>
While I must admit I'm not sure how to do this, some fee for
IP addresses sounds like natural way. So I must agree, if you
are happy IPv6 user who had no problems to move from IPv4 (or
started at IPv6 directly) and doesn't need IPv4 addresses
anymore, just return them all and you can stop to care about
it and less lucky us. You may even have it cheaper. Saying
that you don't need IPv4 because you have IPv6 already sounds
like "I don't have this problem so I don't want/need it to be
solved and I don't care about others" to me. Or in worse
case, it may even be "I like current state because I own those
big blocks and I have profit from it". Nothing personal here,
I wasn't screening anyone and I don't accuse anyone. Just
annoyed from all those "IPv6 solves everything" announcers who
are, at same time, so much against returning of any unused
IPv4 space. Thanks for your understanding.<br>
<br>
<br>
Merry Christmas to everyone<br>
<br>
Matej Vavrousek<br>
CentroNet, a.s.<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net">members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net</a>
[mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net">members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net</a>]
On Behalf Of Andrea Cocito<br>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 5:42 PM<br>
To: Gert Doering<br>
Cc: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net">members-discuss@ripe.net</a><br>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored
by NCC<br>
<br>
<br>
On Dec 12, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Gert Doering <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:gert@space.net">gert@space.net</a>>
wrote:<br>
> IPv4 is *gone*, get over it. No matter of discussion
here or elsewhere<br>
> will bring back IPv4 in quantities needed to "last
forever", so all you<br>
> are doing is postponing the inevitable, and burning lots
of effort and<br>
> money in the denial phase.<br>
<br>
Right, then if the fee scheme is changed in that way there
will be no problem for LIRs who have millions of IPv4
addresses allocated to release them and save money :)<br>
<br>
A.<br>
<br>
<br>
----<br>
If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC
members-discuss<br>
mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go
to the general page:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view"
target="_blank">https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view</a><br>
<br>
Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing
Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.<br>
<br>
<br>
----<br>
If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC
members-discuss<br>
mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go
to the general page:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view"
target="_blank">https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view</a><br>
<br>
Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing
Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">----
If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss
mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view">https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view</a>
Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>