<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/></head><body style="font-family:Geneva,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><div>
<div>
<div>
Hello!<br />
<br />
> My personal opinion is that, being IPv4 a scarse resource, the big<br />
> systems/telco (who holds most of the content in most cases) should be<br />
> pushed to implement IPv6 asap. And that would happen only with an<br />
> aggressive (exponential) IPv4 fee plan that discourage the use of IPv4<br />
> address space.<br />
<br />
In Russia big telco tell us that they have troubles with using IPv6. Often <br />
<span class="hps">often</span> <span class="hps">the manufacturer write that IPv6 supported, but it doesn't work.<br />
<br />
And any aggressive fee plan will just increase costs and will not help with<br />
developing network. I think that big providers will make changes only when<br />
IP-adddresses in IPv4 will be finished. In this case telecom will request IPv6<br />
support. </span></div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
--<br />
Alexey S Ivanov<br />
General Director<br />
LeaderTelecom Ltd.
<div id="myEventWatcherDiv" style="display:none;">
</div>
</body></html>