<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/></head><body style="font-family:Geneva,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">Hi, Erik!<br />
<br />
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt" type="cite">
>> 1) a discussion about what is the cost and do we want to keep the cost allocation<br />
>> as is. For instance, do we keep a 650k Euro loss a year for the RIPE meetings or<br />
>> is a change in operating / cost allocation required ?<br />
><br />
>I see that in budget for 2011 year scheduled expenditure:<br />
><br />
>RIPE meeting - 875 kEUR<br />
>Training Courses - 383 kEUR<br />
>Regional Meetings - 263 kEUR,<br />
><br />
>Summary meeting cost: 1521kEUR.<br />
><br />
>Now we have the following situation: each LIR pays defined cost for all of meetings which are being hold during whole year. But actually not every LIR->representative visits such meetings.<br />
>So there is a question: Maybe there is no need to hold such meetings and trainings while we could run a lot of Webinars. Webinars would not be such >cost-based as real meetings, but could be such useful as them.<br />
<br />
If you look closer to the RIPE meetings for instance, there is also an income to<br />
the RIPE meetings. It is about 250k Euro a year if I'm correct.<br />
And the RIPE meetings are in fact, open to members and none-members ...</div>
<br />
Yes. 1521 - 250 = 1271 kEUR.<br />
<br />
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt" type="cite">
Is it required to hire a boat / hotel etc for a week to accommodate the number to<br />
participants including full service (foot and free drinks) in order to have the<br />
meetings. And why should the membership fee pay for this 625k Euro yearly loss?<br />
I see no shame in using a way of recovering for the open bars .. For instance by<br />
the use of tickets / chips. X free drinks per RIPE attendee, additional chips at<br />
2.50 euro per chip. And those chips can be used for food and/or drinks.</div>
<br />
I sure that if someone need this service - they can pay it. It is not right to distribute<br />
expenses to all members. I think each person who will drink and eat can buy what they will.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt" type="cite">
Do I even dare to ask what the cost is going to be for the temp setup of free wifi<br />
in the venue's for only 1 week for about 400 people with each (on average) 3 wifi<br />
capable devices each ?</div>
<br />
The same. I suggest to buy it if they need. I cost too much. Why should pay for that<br />
member which don't need it.<br />
<br />
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt" type="cite">
On the training courses, it is my personal view that the setup fee should cover a<br />
part of the training cost.<br />
That means that per new lir there should be a limited number of free seats for<br />
each training.. and every additional consumed training seat should be paid for.<br />
The companies that have lots of changes in their trained employees, that they<br />
should also pay for additional seats used during the trainings.</div>
<br />
Why part? Setup fee for trainings should cover all training cost. If I need this service - I'll buy it.<br />
We don't have to distribute this expeneses to all LIRs. It is logical.<br />
<br />
--<br />
Alexey S Ivanov<br />
General Director<br />
LeaderTelecom Ltd</body></html>