<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/></head><body style="font-family:Geneva,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><div>
<div>
<div>
Dear Nigel,</div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
> We are looking at increased costs largely because we expect the "run out<br />
> fairly" and IPv4 depletion measures to result in much more work for<br />
> registration services.<br />
<br />
Could you tell what you mean when you tell about "much more work for registration services" ?<br />
<br />
> Full budget (and charging scheme<br />
> details) will be available well in time for the AGM.<br />
<br />
New charging scheme in not very good balanced. IP-address have very high value. AS - not. When end user need IP-addresses - most of time needs for understand how customer will use IP-addresses and ASN RIPE give automatic and as a result cost of assignment ASN is not the same as assigment IP-addreses. I think cost of ASN assignment should be 0 euro. As a result this resource should'n included on calculating size of LIR. I suggest to remove this column from charging scheme.<br />
<br />
--<br />
Alexey S Ivanov<br />
General Director<br />
LeaderTelecom Ltd.
<div id="myEventWatcherDiv" style="display:none;">
</div>
</body></html>