<font size="2"><p>Please remove alopez@adif.es From the list. <br></p></font><hr><font size="2"><p> ----- Mensaje original -----<br><b> De: </b>Nafis Dwaalster [nafis@dwaalster.nl]<br><b> Enviado: </b>18/06/2009 18:44 ZE2<br><b> Para: </b>members-discuss@ripe.net<br><b> Asunto: </b>Re: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010<br></p></font><br>
Ripe,<br><br>Please remove <a href="mailto:nafis@dwaalster.nl">nafis@dwaalster.nl</a> as well from the list<br><br>thank you<br><br>Nafis<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/6/18 Adapt Service Desk <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:servicedesk@adaptplc.com">servicedesk@adaptplc.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Ripe,<br>
<br>
Please remove us from this discussion thread. It is totally irrelevant to us and is filling our mailbox with junk.<br>
<br>
You may have the following e-mail addresses on record,<br>
<br>
<a href="mailto:servicedesk@adaptplc.com">servicedesk@adaptplc.com</a><br>
<a href="mailto:support@mnet.co.uk">support@mnet.co.uk</a><br>
<a href="mailto:hostmaster@adaptplc.com">hostmaster@adaptplc.com</a><br>
<a href="mailto:hostmaster@mnet.co.uk">hostmaster@mnet.co.uk</a><br>
<br>
please remove them all.<br>
<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Raj Bola<br>
Service Desk Manager<br>
<br>
adapt<br>
New Broad Street House, 35 New Broad Street, London EC2M 1NH<br>
t: +44 (0)845 304 3046<br>
e: <a href="mailto:servicedesk@adaptplc.com">servicedesk@adaptplc.com</a> <br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.adaptplc.com" target="_blank">www.adaptplc.com</a><br>
<br>
adapt, the independent managed services provider offering the broadest choice of next generation technologies, and doing right by our customers.<br>
<br>
adapt to success! We're ranked 15th in the 2008 Tech Track 100.<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:members-discuss-admin@ripe.net">members-discuss-admin@ripe.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:members-discuss-admin@ripe.net">members-discuss-admin@ripe.net</a>] On Behalf Of ?????? ??????<br>
Sent: 18 June 2009 12:56<br>
To: Hostmaster; Natalya Petrova; <a href="mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net">members-discuss@ripe.net</a><br>
Subject: RE: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010<br>
<br>
Hi All!<br>
<br>
There's no such document in RIPE database.<br>
But I suppose Natalya is speaking about this:<br>
<br>
"[Apologies for duplicate emails]<br>
<br>
Dear Colleagues,<br>
<br>
The RIPE NCC is currently formulating the Draft Charging Scheme 2010.<br>
The Draft Charging Scheme 2010 will take into account the requirements of policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC", and the discussions that took place at the RIPE NCC General Meeting in May 2009 regarding the 2010 Charging Scheme.<br>
<br>
The main features of the Draft Charging Scheme 2010 will be:<br>
<br>
- As in previous years, there will be five membership categories - Extra Small, Small, Medium, Large and Extra Large<br>
- The 2010 fee for each membership category will be the same as for 2009<br>
- An algorithm will determine a score that decides what category a member belongs to<br>
- The score will be based on Provider Aggregatable (PA) IPv4 and PA IPv6 allocated over time<br>
- Direct assignments will have a recurring charge per assignment and the fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment<br>
<br>
The RIPE NCC will publish the Draft Charging Scheme 2010 at the beginning of July 2009. The RIPE NCC Executive Board will then monitor discussion and input from the RIPE NCC membership before publishing a final version of the Draft Charging Scheme 2010 by 9 September 2009. The RIPE NCC membership will vote on this version at the RIPE NCC General Meeting on 7 October 2009.<br>
<br>
The RIPE NCC notes that this proposal for the Draft Charging Scheme 2010 is subject to change based on advice from the RIPE NCC's lawyers on tax and legal issues.<br>
<br>
Membership discussion of the Draft Charging Scheme 2010 proposal can take place at <<a href="mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net">members-discuss@ripe.net</a>>.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Axel Pawlik<br>
Managing Director<br>
RIPE NCC"<br>
<br>
Kind Regards<br>
Sergey Sulava<br>
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:members-discuss-admin@ripe.net">members-discuss-admin@ripe.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:members-discuss-admin@ripe.net">members-discuss-admin@ripe.net</a>] On Behalf Of Hostmaster<br>
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 3:22 PM<br>
To: Natalya Petrova; <a href="mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net">members-discuss@ripe.net</a><br>
Subject: RE: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010<br>
<br>
Privyet Natalya<br>
<br>
Where is this document? I cant see it on RIPE?<br>
<br>
</div>Mark<br>
<div class="im"><br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:members-discuss-admin@ripe.net">members-discuss-admin@ripe.net</a><br>
</div>[mailto:<a href="mailto:members-discuss-admin@ripe.net">members-discuss-admin@ripe.net</a>] On Behalf Of Natalya Petrova<br>
Sent: 18 June 2009 11:29<br>
To: <a href="mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net">members-discuss@ripe.net</a><br>
Subject: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010<br>
<br>
RegID: kz.kazaktelecom<br>
<br>
Good morning, dear colleagues!<br>
Thanks for your message.<br>
I have read on a site the information be relative Charging Scheme<br>
2010. There are some questions for me.<br>
I ask the help in the explanatory.<br>
Questions:<br>
1) " - Direct assignments will have a recurring charge per assignment<br>
and the<br>
fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment" - It mentions only PI? or<br>
PA? or PI+PA?<br>
2) "fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment" - It every month a<br>
payment? or every quarter? or for a year?<br>
3) "fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment" - It is payment for what<br>
quantity of addresses (50EUR= ? IPs)?<br>
4) " - Direct assignments will have a recurring charge per assignment<br>
and the<br>
fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment" - Operates for all direct<br>
assignments? or Only new direct assignments (included after 3 May,<br>
2009)?<br>
I shall be very grateful for explanatories.<br>
Thanks for the help and understanding.<br>
Yours faithfully,<br>
Natalya<br>
<br>
<br>
*Disclaimer:*<br>
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information<br>
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If<br>
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are<br>
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this<br>
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.<br>
<br>
*Ограничения:*<br>
Данное сообщение (включая любые вложения) может содержать<br>
конфиденциальную информацию и быть предназначенным исключительно<br>
для личности или организации, которой оно адресовано. Если Вы не<br>
являетесь надлежащим адресатом, то настоящим Вы уведомлены, что любое<br>
раскрытие, копирование, распространение или использование содержания<br>
этого сообщения строго запрещено.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
This message has been scanned for viruses by Mail Control - <a href="http://www.adaptplc.com" target="_blank">www.adaptplc.com</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,<br><br>Nafis Dwaalster<br>