This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ripe] Questions to RIPE NCC in light of last GM
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Questions to RIPE NCC in light of last GM
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Questions to RIPE NCC in light of last GM
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stefan Wahl
stefan.wahl at open7.net
Mon May 27 13:44:54 CEST 2024
+1 and a scoop of stracciatella please regards Stefan > Am 27.05.2024 um 13:33 schrieb Tobias Fiebig via members-discuss <members-discuss at ripe.net>: > > Moin, > > So, first of all; +1 to Randy's point. > > Second: > >> Its okay :) >> Some members doesnt want transperancy. >> Im happy about they leave comments and show their position. > > What I presume these +1-ing members (like me) are mildly frustrated > with is a set of specific members--without pointing fingers--being > relatively avid in issuing 'transparency' asks, while it becomes > increasingly difficult to ascertain whether the objective here is > transparency, or whether transparency becomes a vehicle to make > requests targeted at drowning the organization in repetitive > unnecessary tasks and preventing consensus seem reasonable. > > And for all other points, I refer to my comment from the last meeting: > > We couldn't agree on something when the task would be 'Every member > gets a free ball of ice cream'; I mean... Vanilla, Strawberry, > Chocolate, without Milk... decisions to be made! Heck, for what it's > worth, I doubt that _two_ LIRs could resolve this question (or... one, > if the one offered a free ball of ice cream would be me). > > The level of detail ask for, e.g., the (rapidly decreasing!) rack use > in AMS... I am certain there would be enough questions phrased as > comments alone on that to double the LIR fee next year (to pay for the > increased operating cost of the mailinglist...) > > So, please... let the RIPE NCC do its job. If you want to get more > intricately involved in the daily operations of systems, I suggest to > go here: https://www.ripe.net/about-us/staff/careers-at-the-ripe-ncc/ > > With best regards, > Tobias > > P.S.: >> Waiting next... > > Oh, is there a queue? Do me, do me! de.wybt! If all the cool kids^W > LIRs get this, I want in, too! > > -- > Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig > T +31 616 80 98 99 > M tobias at fiebig.nl > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/stefan.wahl%40open7.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240527/71ec93e9/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2428 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240527/71ec93e9/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Questions to RIPE NCC in light of last GM
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Questions to RIPE NCC in light of last GM
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]