[members-discuss] Questions to RIPE NCC in light of last GM

Moin,

So, first of all; +1 to Randy's point.

Second:

> Its okay :)
> Some members doesnt want transperancy.
> Im happy about they leave comments and show their position.

What I presume these +1-ing members (like me) are mildly frustrated
with is a set of specific members--without pointing fingers--being
relatively avid in issuing 'transparency' asks, while it becomes
increasingly difficult to ascertain whether the objective here is
transparency, or whether transparency becomes a vehicle to make
requests targeted at drowning the organization in repetitive
unnecessary tasks and preventing consensus seem reasonable.

And for all other points, I refer to my comment from the last meeting:

We couldn't agree on something when the task would be 'Every member
gets a free ball of ice cream'; I mean... Vanilla, Strawberry,
Chocolate, without Milk... decisions to be made! Heck, for what it's
worth, I doubt that _two_ LIRs could resolve this question (or... one,
if the one offered a free ball of ice cream would be me).

The level of detail ask for, e.g., the (rapidly decreasing!) rack use
in AMS... I am certain there would be enough questions phrased as
comments alone on that to double the LIR fee next year (to pay for the
increased operating cost of the mailinglist...)

So, please... let the RIPE NCC do its job. If you want to get more
intricately involved in the daily operations of systems, I suggest to
go here: https://www.ripe.net/about-us/staff/careers-at-the-ripe-ncc/

With best regards,
Tobias  

P.S.:
> Waiting next...

Oh, is there a queue? Do me, do me! de.wybt! If all the cool kids^W
LIRs get this, I want in, too!

-- 
Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
T +31 616 80 98 99
M tobias at fiebig.nl