[members-discuss] Sustainability and diversity

Hi,

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:30:53PM +0000, Kurtis Lindqvist wrote:
> While this might not seem like a major difference, I think part
> of the problem is exactly this. Perhaps the members SHOULD vote on
> the activity plan? At least the members might read it then?..

TBH, I thought we did actually vote (or at least "formally confirm")
the activity plan, but the meeting minutes disagree with me.  So, no,
we did not.

But I agree that we should.

This said, this might actually be an even worse rat-hole than the
charging scheme - how many resolutions do you want on it?  In what
detail level?

Like, "shall registration services continue to do due process, even if
it's costing 2 MEU per year?" (I could see lots of LIRs of a certain
category vote "no" on this one).   This would, obviously, be a bad idea.

Even questions like "shall we keep RIPE atlas?" or "shall we move the
RIPE database into the cloud, they tell us it will save 1MEU/Year?" are
loaded...


I *like* the idea of formally confirming "yes, dear EB, the majority of
membership is fine with the proposed activity plan" (that is, the majority
of those that can be bothered).  But what if the answer is "no"?

Questions elicit answers, answers need to bring consequences...

Tough.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla,
                                           Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240516/51d78ff2/attachment-0001.sig>