This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Sustainability and diversity
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Sustainability and diversity
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Sustainability and diversity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz - Go6
jan at go6.si
Thu May 16 16:24:39 CEST 2024
On 16. 5. 24 15:30, Kurtis Lindqvist wrote: > Not to quibble but I think we need to be a bit more precise. The members > have not formally accepted the activity plan, the Executive Board have. > The members where provided the chance to give input on the activity plan. I did not go and check - but was there any input given by any member? > While this might not seem like a major difference, I think part of the > problem is exactly this. Perhaps the members SHOULD vote on the activity > plan? At least the members might read it then….. That might be a good idea, but at the same time this might render the GMs muuuuch longer :) Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Sustainability and diversity
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Sustainability and diversity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]