This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Sustainability and diversity
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Sustainability and diversity
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Sustainability and diversity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz - Go6
jan at go6.si
Thu May 16 14:48:10 CEST 2024
On 16. 5. 24 14:33, Sebastian-Wilhelm Graf wrote: > "put something forward"... > > Many members have put forward potential schemes on this list. > Many members have put forward and voted for a point to be added to the > agenda regarding the charging scheme (checking, this proposal has more > than 700 signatures to date). > > To wich the boards reaction was basically them not adding any options > based on feedback.... Then when people appear to be complaing about > that This has been repeated for the n-th time already. EB can't put an option of a lower budget (and members fee) on the agenda as they need to follow the (accepted by RIPE NCC members) activity plan and assure the budget for it. Period. At this point lower budget is not possible. You are all barking at the wrong tree. When the activity plan comes into a discussion at (and prior to the GM) - that's the time to start proposing changes if you really want them. Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Sustainability and diversity
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Sustainability and diversity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]