[members-discuss] How can I vote against Charging Scheme A, B and C

Hello.
If you look in deep: category-based model is same protection scheme for
big holders.  For me: only flat-model can return some stability.
---
Dmitry Serbulov

> Hello all,
>
> For what it's worth, and to be clear: I voted against the proposed
> category-based model last year. But not against its principle.
>
> I strongly support the idea of a category-based model, but I also
> strongly support the idea of "if you are a big player, you should
> support the NCC's expense more than smaller structures". But I did vote
> against because of its limitation on bigger categories. It's a equality
> vs equity topic.
>
> And, yes, the most easy way to do it can be related to resources
> holding. Big LIRs won't cancel their membership. And if RIPE community
> (and/or NCC) is afraid that the resources would be transfered to
> another RIR for economic reasons, then, we still could limit RIR-to-RIR
> resources transfer.
>
> Regards,
>
> Clément Cavadore
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru
>


-----------------------------
С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий
ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком"
+7(498)785-8-000 раб.
+7(495)940-92-11 доп.
+7(925)518-10-69 сот.