This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] How can I vote against Charging Scheme A, B and C
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] How can I vote against Charging Scheme A, B and C
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] How can I vote against Charging Scheme A, B and C
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clement Cavadore
ccavadore at vedege.net
Thu May 16 10:41:13 CEST 2024
Hello all, For what it's worth, and to be clear: I voted against the proposed category-based model last year. But not against its principle. I strongly support the idea of a category-based model, but I also strongly support the idea of "if you are a big player, you should support the NCC's expense more than smaller structures". But I did vote against because of its limitation on bigger categories. It's a equality vs equity topic. And, yes, the most easy way to do it can be related to resources holding. Big LIRs won't cancel their membership. And if RIPE community (and/or NCC) is afraid that the resources would be transfered to another RIR for economic reasons, then, we still could limit RIR-to-RIR resources transfer. Regards, Clément Cavadore
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] How can I vote against Charging Scheme A, B and C
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] How can I vote against Charging Scheme A, B and C
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]