This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz - Go6
jan at go6.si
Tue May 14 17:16:27 CEST 2024
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote: > If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more > votes? Im think so - NO. If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :) > > In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. > Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other! If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :) Do we really want that? Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]