[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members

Yes.

I can (almost) accept that for a national election (and that is debatable), but for a NGO/NPO, where the voting members are considered as experts in their field, it sounds a bit off.

David

> Le 14 mai 2024 à 13:38, Clement Cavadore via members-discuss <members-discuss at ripe.net> a écrit :
> 
> On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 13:33 +0200, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>> 
>> In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be
>> abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a
>> resolution to achieve a majority and pass.
>> 
>> The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting
>> works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be
>> considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and
>> invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes."
>> 
>> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-voting
> 
> 
> best recipe on how to make an unwanted decision pass.
> Good game, folks. 
> 
> Clément Cavadore
> 
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/david.ponzone%40ipeva.fr