[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clement Cavadore
ccavadore at vedege.net
Tue May 14 13:38:23 CEST 2024
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 13:33 +0200, Fergal Cunningham wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be > abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a > resolution to achieve a majority and pass. > > The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting > works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be > considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and > invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes." > > https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-voting best recipe on how to make an unwanted decision pass. Good game, folks. Clément Cavadore
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]