This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clement Cavadore
ccavadore at vedege.net
Tue May 14 13:38:23 CEST 2024
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 13:33 +0200, Fergal Cunningham wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be > abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a > resolution to achieve a majority and pass. > > The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting > works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be > considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and > invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes." > > https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-voting best recipe on how to make an unwanted decision pass. Good game, folks. Clément Cavadore
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]