This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS
m.terzioglu at prebits.de
Sat May 11 00:45:37 CEST 2024
Hi, thank you. I have things that i agree with you and things that i dont agree. This is a way to reach some of the members, EB and make a voice. Many of the members here shared their ideas tried to stay in touch with their community, NOGs etc.. In this discussion list and in other channels many member shared their ideas or alternatives. Last year may be only 10-15% of members have voted. Only for the proposal for the old scheme in 3-4 days 700 members has voted. I think this is a sign of the needed change. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de m.terzioglu at prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902 > Am 10.05.2024 um 23:10 schrieb Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan at go6.si>: > > On 10. 5. 24 19:01, Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS wrote: >> a LIR with more than 3% of the allocation organised by RIPE NCC pays >> same as a LIR who owns lower than %0,001 of the total resource of the >> RIPE NCC. > > I agree that this doesn't seem very fair, and that was also my question > back in the days when we decided to abandon the categories and go for > flat fee for everybody. So DT pays the same as my neighbour with a small > ISP in his garage. > > The reasoning back then was something around "this is a club membership > fee and usually the club membership is the same for everyone and when > you are a member of a club - you can get the resources that you need." > > I'm not sure that we can get the categories based fees back as in > whichever way we try to define them - there are more people voting at > the GM that would have to pay more than the ones that would have to pay > less - and the majority usually wins. > > Now - why the small LIRs don't cast their vote and bring the categories > based membership back? That's maybe the question that you need to ask or > maybe act on it. What I've seen here is just people repeating and > whining about how unfair this is... ;) > > Cheers, Jan > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits.de -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240511/9dfbc7b9/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]