This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz - Go6
jan at go6.si
Fri May 10 23:51:09 CEST 2024
Rob, On 10. 5. 24 22:46, Rob Evans wrote: >> So the real discussion shouldn't be the budget and member fees, but >> the activity plan - the budget needs to follow that. :) > > I was trying to remind myself of this. Up until about 2011/2012, both > were on the agenda at the autumn meeting. I’ve got a vague > recollection that there was a desire to set the charging scheme > earlier so it could make its way into budgets earlier in the year, > but perhaps I’m misremembering. Well, there are two possible ways of doing it: - get the activity plan with all the projects approved and then ask for budget for it or - get the fictional budget approved and then try to retrofit all your activity in there. I think I know which one I would choose ;) Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]