[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Pearson
daniel at privatesystems.net
Tue May 7 16:13:53 CEST 2024
Based on their response, it seems we have no choice but to replace the board? "This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board...." They just don't want to listen to us. On 5/7/24 9:08 AM, Clement Cavadore wrote: > On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 09:01 -0500, Daniel Pearson wrote: >> Please allow me to summarize this long email. >> >> "We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do >> what we want to do". > That's a very realistic tl;dr from Ondřej's mail. And I am still > completely disappointed in what RIPE NCC and its board are doing. > > "You have the right to disagree, but still, we don't care, and we'll > move on with what we decided, even if we are sitting on a big financial > reserve which could offer us some time to find better solutions" >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]