This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Pearson
daniel at privatesystems.net
Tue May 7 16:13:53 CEST 2024
Based on their response, it seems we have no choice but to replace the board? "This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board...." They just don't want to listen to us. On 5/7/24 9:08 AM, Clement Cavadore wrote: > On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 09:01 -0500, Daniel Pearson wrote: >> Please allow me to summarize this long email. >> >> "We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do >> what we want to do". > That's a very realistic tl;dr from Ondřej's mail. And I am still > completely disappointed in what RIPE NCC and its board are doing. > > "You have the right to disagree, but still, we don't care, and we'll > move on with what we decided, even if we are sitting on a big financial > reserve which could offer us some time to find better solutions" >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]