This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Questions about the published Draft Agenda and Supporting Documents
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Questions about the published Draft Agenda and Supporting Documents
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Denis Fondras - Liopen
ripe at liopen.fr
Sat Mar 30 17:33:50 CET 2024
Le Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 05:15:18PM +0100, Andreas Schmieja a écrit : > > Maintaining allocations for long time generates far less costs than transfers. > This is a good observation. If we assume that : 1- number of LIR decreases because they were just opened to get some part of the last-/8 and now they are closing after transfer to the "parent" LIR 2- transfer cause a higher workload at RIPE Perhaps we could make the transfer more expensive than keeping the LIR open for 5/7 years (instead of the current 2 years). Obviously it will not solve the initial problem of how to keep RIPE NCC budget/services without increasing membership fee too much. It will just give us some time to come up with another solution (which may well be start to remove the fat at RIPE NCC). -- Denis Fondras / Liopen
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Questions about the published Draft Agenda and Supporting Documents
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]