This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] GM topic
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Final RIPE NCC Charging Schemes for Members to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ivaylo
ivaylo at bglans.net
Mon Apr 29 12:09:29 CEST 2024
https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/4/ Is absolutely reasonable. If a LIR which do not hold legacy resources (legacy IPV4 space and legacy ASN space), and RIPE can not provide one of the 3 resource components (IPV4 space, IPV6 space, ASN), the anual fee should be at least 1/3 lower for the period the LIR do not have full list of components. You have my support on this. Ivaylo Josifov VarnaIX / Varteh LTD +359 52 969393 Varna, Bulgaria On Sat, 27 Apr 2024, Dmitry Kohmanyuk via members-discuss wrote: [NON-Text Body part not included]
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Final RIPE NCC Charging Schemes for Members to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]