This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] GM topic
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ondrej Zajicek
santiago at crfreenet.org
Fri Apr 26 17:59:27 CEST 2024
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 05:16:15PM +0200, Michel Lanners wrote: > Can we stop discussing (and believing) that high costs for IPv4 would lead to enough IPv4 being returned to make everybody happy? > > That will never be the case! There simply isn’t enough IPv4, so let’s stop riding that dead horse! This is a strawman argument. Putting economic pressure on holding IPv4 addresses is not supposed to push for its returns nor to 'make everyone happy'. It is supposed to push for economic usage of limited resource by, say, leasing or selling of unused or marginally used addresses. That does not make everyone happy, but could lead to overall better distribution and less waste. -- Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]