This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] GM topic
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Suchy
danny at danysek.cz
Thu Apr 25 11:03:36 CEST 2024
But the fact that how many addresses LIR holds does not imply how many tickets it generates. Please don't use this the popular lie that more LIR automatically generates more tickets when he has larger allocation. Experienced people with years of experience usually work there compared to new startup LIRs, who are learning related stuff (and and sometimes asks over ticket). And documentation of assignments is a community requirement. And from this perspective fair-share of related expenes (IT etc) is on the contrary, adequate. - Daniel On 4/25/24 12:32 AM, M. Omer GOLGELI via members-discuss wrote: > A LIR with a single assignment shouldn't be paying the same amount (or a few hundred less) compared to a LIR with a /8 and hundreds of ASNs, tickets etc. Due to using more assignments, having more needs, if they are using more resources (IT, DB, human, legal etc.) then they should be paying a lot more. > > It doesn't make sense pay for their operating costs on the dime of smaller LIRs. > And I don't understand why this kind of Charging Scheme is never made part of these votings.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]