This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] New RIPE Labs Article - Building a stable future for the RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New RIPE Labs Article - Building a stable future for the RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Financial Perspective on Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sergey Myasoedov
kaa at net-art.cz
Fri Apr 19 08:03:06 CEST 2024
Hank, first of all, I am sure the NCC board do remember about the membership amount enough to get a qualified majority. Second, what can the qualified majority do? Elect two or three (once in 3 years) board members? Put in issue two or three members' election? Anyway, thank you for taking this issue in mind. -- Best, Sergey > On 19. 4. 2024, at 1:52, Hank Nussbacher <hank at interall.co.il> wrote: > > On 18/04/2024 16:17, Remco van Mook wrote: > > Dear Remco and others, > > One fear that I have that can threaten a stable RIPE NCC is the hostile takeover of the RIPE NCC. With the average annual cost of a LIR being about 2KEuro, what is to stop some malicious actor with 5MEuro in his/her pocket to creating 2500 valid new paying members and hijacking the vote for the board and the vote for cost sharing and in regards to new allocations? > > I think the time has come for RIPE NCC to create "golden shares": > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_share > assigned to around 20-30 well known organizations/people that have always had the best interest of RIPE on their minds - which can outvote any hostile takeover. > > Regards, > Hank > > >> Dear colleagues, >> I’d like to draw your attention to an article that was just published on RIPE Labs, about building a stable future for the RIPE NCC. >> As it touches on some very foundational aspects all across the various working groups and NCC membership, I thought it important to share, and I would very much like to ask everyone for their input and ideas. >> In order to not spread the discussion too much across the various mailing lists, I suggest that we use the general RIPE list (which I’ve put into the reply-to field of this email. >> I’m currently in the process of organising a BOF during RIPE 88 on this topic as well and am looking forward to a constructive discussion! >> Kind regards, >> Remco van Mook >> RIPE NCC Executive Board >> _______________________________________________ >> members-discuss mailing list >> members-discuss at ripe.net >> https://mailman.ripe.net/ >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/hank%40interall.co.il > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/kaa%40net-art.cz
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New RIPE Labs Article - Building a stable future for the RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Financial Perspective on Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]