This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastien Brossier
sebastien at brossier.org
Tue Apr 16 23:10:00 CEST 2024
I made my calculations by parsing this file: https://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/stats/membership/alloclist.txt This file does not list LIRs without allocations, so I also used the total number of LIRs from the latest member update to estimate the number of LIRs without allocations. There are currently more LIRs than there will be in 2025, due to consolidations, which is why I calculated the average fee per LIR to have a meaningful comparison. The sum of all fees with the current number of LIRs is above budget. On 16/04/2024 17:48, m.terzioglu at prebits.de wrote: > How can be tested or calculated, if this model generates enough budget or less budget?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]