This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kaj Niemi
kajtzu at basen.net
Tue Apr 16 20:47:51 CEST 2024
Hi, Good points. On the topic of AFRINIC, I would slightly disagree. Membership numbers have been increasing from about 1200 in 2018-ish, when they restated revenue, at around 5.3M USD to the 6M-ish USD I mentioned in my previous email. I haven't actively been following the story there but assumed the legal troubles started FY2021-ish.. since revenue was restated, there was probably something else going on earlier. They spent about 140k on legal in 2022 although only non-audited numbers exist. I'm reading it as if the legal issues themselves did not affect revenue one way or another. As for RIPE, well, I'm advocating on spending less and crystallizing the value prop because right now it's all over the place. 1. LIRs [must] pay because they need the registry services 2. In exchange they get a ton of services that many do not use at all 3. All services and functions are necessary because [list with many reasons] 4. "We need to increase the fees because of 2 and 3" 5. Goto 1 That being said, the gym analogy someone replied with a few days ago is quite apt. Most people there, too, pay but do not use. Kaj Sent from my iPad ________________________________ From: Kurt Jaeger <members-discuss at nepustil.net> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 8:06 PM To: Kaj Niemi <kajtzu at basen.net> Cc: members-discuss at ripe.net <members-discuss at ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic) [You don't often get email from members-discuss at nepustil.net. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Hi! Thanks for writing up those stats. > Let's do some napkin math and comps with the other RIRs. [...] > > RIPE, revenue 38M EUR (40M USD), members 20k = 2 k/member > ARIN, revenue 25M USD, members 25k = 1 k/member > APNIC, revenue 33M AUD (21M USD), members 10k = 2 k/member > LACNIC, revenue 10M USD, members 12k = 0.8 k/member > AFRINIC, revenue 6M USD, members 2k = 3 k/member [...] > Now, in my opinion, there are a few surprises. > ARIN, located in a very expensive country, is quite efficient per member. I think one has to analyse if ARIN and RIPE do the same when it comes to reach-out, research etc. I'm not sure that ARIN is as active as RIPE is. Also: The language barrier in the service area is much more difficult to traverse than in the ARIN service area. And the RIPE has to cope with a very difficult legal and political landscape compared to ARIN. > On the other hand, AFRINIC seems to be rather inefficient. I would not hold that against AFRINIC, given their legal and political landscape. -- MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger Now what ? Dr.-Ing. Nepustil & Co. GmbH fon +49 7123 93006-0 pi at nepustil.net Rathausstr. 3 mob +49 171 3101372 72658 Bempflingen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240416/e196137d/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]