[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals

On 12/04/2024 10:56, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:59:37AM +0200, Sebastien Brossier wrote:
>> Correct, but the question is: is it ok for the option to reject the proposed
>> resolution to be missing ?
> 
> This option would take away the necessary resources for the NCC to do
> what they presented at the autumn AGM.  So, yes, this would be a very
> poor choice.
> 
> The question is not "if" this is the budget, the question is "how can
> the costs for this budget be distributed?".  So "no!" can not be a valid
> choice for that question.

Hi,

I agree that a rejection is not desirable and would put the NCC in a 
difficult situation. All voting options should result in the same budget.

I'm not asking if it is desirable, but if it is *legal* to remove the 
choice to reject a proposal.
I think it is better to ask the question now, rather than take the risk 
of seeing someone challenge the vote result later.


Regards,
Sebastien Brossier