[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals

Unfortunately.
It is look like select between the kind of sheets for eat...
But NCC must decide how to fill up budget. So it is wrong direction to
talk now about simple reduce pays.

I have next Idea for what to do:

It is need to divide NCC budget to 'functional' part and 'investigation'
part. Functionally part is only registration and finance function NCC,
which fell up by equal for all members contribution, 'investigation'  part
is used for all other NCC functionality and fell up by payment for
deficite resources.


> Correct, but the question is: is it ok for the option to reject the
> proposed resolution to be missing ?
>
> If it is ok, it means that the membership can be forced to adopt any
> resolution, just by having various similar options. This is a loophole
> that could be exploited for nefarious purposes.
>
> If not, the vote as proposed is invalid.
>
>
> To be clear: my intention is not to promote a rejection of the charging
> scheme. This is a more general concern. I find very suspicious to see a
> resolution proposal that can't be rejected, in the general meeting of a
> membership-based association.
>
>
> Sebastien Brossier
>
>
>
> On 11/04/2024 12:39, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
>> Dear Sebastien,
>>
>> According to Article 18.3 of the Articles of Association, if a proposed
>> resolution contains various options, the method of instant run-off
>> voting is used, as described in the same article (similar to the
>> elections of EB members).
>>
>> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-voting
>> <https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-voting>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Fergal
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:52 AM Sebastien Brossier
>> <sebastien at brossier.org <mailto:sebastien at brossier.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 10/04/2024 14:54, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
>>      > The vote for this proposal would not allow all options to be
>>     rejected.
>>      > It would be run with the instant run-off vote format in the same
>>     way as
>>      > the Executive Board election is run. So members would be asked to
>>     vote
>>      > for the three options in order of preference and the scheme that
>>      > achieves more than 50% of preferences either on the first round
>> or
>>      > second round would be deemed to have been chosen.
>>
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     Is this even legal, wrt the articles of association ?
>>     Holding a vote to adopt an item, without a reject option.
>>
>>
>>     Best regards,
>>     Sebastien Brossier
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru
>


-----------------------------
С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий
ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком"
+7(498)785-8-000 раб.
+7(495)940-92-11 доп.
+7(925)518-10-69 сот.