This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [RFC] Motion/Proposal for Amendments to RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [RFC] Motion/Proposal for Amendments to RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [RFC] Motion/Proposal for Amendments to RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alarig Le Lay
alarig at grifon.fr
Thu Apr 11 21:44:01 CEST 2024
On Thu 11 Apr 2024 14:36:35 GMT, Daniel Pearson wrote: > Hi Denys, > > Thank you for bringing forth this motion, I do not disagree with it on > it's premise. I also fully agree with the call for RIPE to reduce its > budget accordingly. > > I would recommend one addition to your proposal. > > "We suggest that RIPE NCC implement a weighed voting model based upon > the number of resources billed to a LIR. This would ensure that a LIR is > equally represented directly in relation to it's financial contribution > to RIPE." > > If such a motion is added, I'm sure those who will pay substantially > higher amounts will not object to having one vote per billed subnet or a > similar implementation. So next year they can revert all the work and nobody will have enough vote to go against? -- Alarig
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [RFC] Motion/Proposal for Amendments to RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [RFC] Motion/Proposal for Amendments to RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]