This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Charging Scheme 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme 2025
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wieger Bontekoe
wieger.bontekoe at productsup.com
Wed Apr 10 15:25:57 CEST 2024
I still find it very special that if you look at an ISP that has +/- 1500 resource assignments, they only pay a maximum of 115k per year (!) with all these models, even though they have millions in turnover and are the largest customer of the basic services of RIPE. This does not seem like a sustainable financial plan to me. *Wieger Bontekoe* Principal Site Reliability Engineer wieger.bontekoe at productsup.com | Den Bosch www.productsup.com *Productsup B.V.* Part of the globally operative Productsup Group - *office locations* <https://www.productsup.com/contact-us/> Den Bosch: Emmaplein 4D 5211 VW 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands KvK-nummer 75051370; VAT ID NL860122657B01 Managing Directors: Vincent Peters, Stefan Sonntag, Koen Looijmans On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 3:20 PM Paul Newton <paul.newton at f4rn.org.uk> wrote: > We are trying to find a diplomatic way to suggest that larger > organisations can afford to contribute more because they can defray the > cost over more clients. > > We have only have 210 clients, so cost per capita is quite significant. > > Paul. > F4RN > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2024, 13:58 Michel Lanners, <michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu> > wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Why on earth is everybody trying to monetize IPv4, i.e. make RIPE fees >> dependant on IPv4 ressources? >> >> I completely fail to see why anybody should pay more for HOLDING any >> number of IPv4 ressources (or other ressources, by the way). >> >> It’s a different story for ressource transfers. So let those selling IPv4 >> pay a fee for the transfer! >> >> And for the rest let’s stick to a real membership fee: one price >> irrespective of which services you use or not. The fitness center doesn’t >> charge you per minute, nor per device you use. It's a flat membership, full >> stop. Hopefully low enough so it doesn’t create a problem for anybody's >> bottom line. >> >> Cheers >> >> *Michel LANNERS* >> CIO at LU-CIX Management G.I.E. >> -- >> <https://www.luxchat.lu/> >> Mail: michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu >> Luxchat: @3eb2pdflrq57:01.lu-cix.luxchat.lu >> Phone: (+352) 28 99 29 92-81 >> >> *LU-CIX Management G.I.E.* >> 202, Z.A.E. Wolser F >> L-3290 Bettembourg >> lu-cix.lu <https://www.lu-cix.lu> >> luxchat.lu <https://www.luxchat.lu> >> luxembourg-internet-days.com >> lunog.lu <https://www.lunog.lu> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> members-discuss mailing list >> members-discuss at ripe.net >> https://mailman.ripe.net/ >> Unsubscribe: >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/paul.newton%40f4rn.org.uk >> > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/wieger.bontekoe%40productsup.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240410/07dc8b87/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme 2025
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]