This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Servperso
ml at servperso.com
Wed Apr 10 15:08:07 CEST 2024
I approve that one too. It's the model other RIR use now. Le 10-04-24 à 14:59, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED a écrit : > Totally agreed! RIPE need to make resources based fee, nor trying to > make budged on small LIRs. > > On 10.04.2024 12:36, Евгений Удовихин wrote: >> Hello colleagues! >> >> I propose to add option "D" of LIR fees proportional to the number of >> IP resources and ASNs of a given LIR. Now we have an unfair situation >> when small companies and huge corporations pay the same amount. >> >> Thank you! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> members-discuss mailing list >> members-discuss at ripe.net >> https://mailman.ripe.net/ >> Unsubscribe: >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/admin%40roskomnadzor.io >> > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ml%40servperso.com
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]