This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Pearson
daniel at privatesystems.net
Wed Apr 10 14:46:07 CEST 2024
Is it? If people are not told that they have a fourth choice, they may be led to incorrectly believe that they only have three choices. I think not explicitly stating the fact that we can still say "no" is deceptive. Daniel~ On 4/10/24 7:44 AM, Rob Evans wrote: > Hi, > >> Why do we not have an option that refuses any rate increases, and forces RIPE to reduce it's budget? >> >> Option D - No change to rates, RIPE reduces budget according to fewer number of LIR! > I believe that is implicit if options A, B and C are all voted down. > > Rob >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]