This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Quarterly Planning Q2 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Евгений Удовихин
eudovihin at gmail.com
Wed Apr 10 14:36:51 CEST 2024
Hello colleagues! I propose to add option "D" of LIR fees proportional to the number of IP resources and ASNs of a given LIR. Now we have an unfair situation when small companies and huge corporations pay the same amount. Thank you! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240410/a0a921cc/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Quarterly Planning Q2 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]