This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Questions about the published Draft Agenda and Supporting Documents
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Questions about the published Draft Agenda and Supporting Documents
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Questions about the published Draft Agenda and Supporting Documents
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lutz Donnerhacke
L.Donnerhacke at iks-service.de
Thu Nov 9 12:30:51 CET 2023
* Gert Doering wrote: > > The contribution to ICANN is split into two parts totalling 823 kUSD: [...] > So, close to one million dollars for that? The main purpose of ICANN is, to keep all kind of non-technical influences (government, law enforcement, intellectual property, moral attitude, organized crime^W^Wcommerce, ...) distant from the really working technical people. In order to reach this goal, ICANN is stuffed with processes, spans working groups and small teams, holds meetings (three times the year in person), reviews the already completed work, reviews the ongoing processes, and the future one by creating new working groups and more meetings. By including everybody and his dog, ICANN binds all interested parties in procedural activities without any hope of any relevant outcome. The main point is, that all those parties are now bounded and do not try to find other ways to aim their pressure to the technical community. Hence: Well spend money.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Questions about the published Draft Agenda and Supporting Documents
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Questions about the published Draft Agenda and Supporting Documents
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]