This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Response to Comments on the Charging Scheme Proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Response to Comments on the Charging Scheme Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Response to Comments on the Charging Scheme Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
José Manuel Giner
jm at ginernet.com
Tue May 30 17:33:16 CEST 2023
Agree 100% On 25/05/2023 21:56, sdy at a-n-t.ru wrote: > If I have 15,000 addresses, then it makes no sense to > return 1000 unnecessary ones! Because I will still pay the same amount. > Therefore, a fee should be charged for each subnet /24. This is the only > way to encourage the return of unused ones. -- José Manuel Giner https://ginernet.com
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Response to Comments on the Charging Scheme Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Response to Comments on the Charging Scheme Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]