[members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme - revolutionary approach

IMO a charging scheme won’t make ipv6 more (or less) popular to the public. Most of the planet doesn't know what a RIR or a LIR, for that matter, is. Nor should they. Ideally most of the planet shouldn’t even need to know what kind of addresses they have nor how many. Things should simply work.

For the companies dealing with these matters the cost will either shifted to the end customer or eaten by the company through a (slightly) lower margin on their services.

Also, good luck getting that through a vote :)




Kaj

Sent from my iPhone
________________________________
From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of J Pawlus <Jerzy.Pawlus at cyf-kr.edu.pl>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 3:27 PM
To: members-discuss at ripe.net <members-discuss at ripe.net>
Subject: [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme - revolutionary approach

Hello,

I know that it is not for this GM meeting but let us consider
different approach to the charging scheme.

IPv4 is dead and any charging scheme based on IPv4 will only
extends its agony.

The new model should be based on IPv6 with highest price being
paid by LIR without IPv6 implemented to some extent.

The criteria could be:

- allocation of IPv6 space from RIPE
- announcement of IPv6 prefix
- DNS and revDNS implemented
- assignement of IPv6 addresses to some End Users
- accessibility of LIR Web Page via IPv6


This approach will clearly increase the speed of IPv6 popularity.
Technically, it has been (or is being) done by RIPE to check
maturity of a LIR with IPv6.

This will also have an impact on LIR End Users if they are told
that they could pay more if they did not move to IPv6.

At the the end some thoughts on current category Model

- the ratio of an price increase/decrease for highest and lowest
  category is certainly not a small step or evolutionary change
  for LIRs in high categories
- All IPv4 allocations has been done with RIPE approval in accordance
  to relevant polices at that time.
- Most IPv4 allocations has been done in times when such thing as NAT
  did not exist.

Best regards,

Jerzy Pawlus

P.S. Any statements contained in this email are personal to the author





_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss at ripe.net
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C01%7C%7C8bfb8b8cc4f7480b67e908db5d1b5d2d%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638206144327289415%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=K8hpcpObkpSXbyfXs64xNdtep5DY44ZajCZGbRpa47g%3D&reserved=0<https://mailman.ripe.net/>
Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fkajtzu%2540basen.net&data=05%7C01%7C%7C8bfb8b8cc4f7480b67e908db5d1b5d2d%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638206144327289415%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NEOlRlPauQk%2FMUtCEunvfPZoQSbxMSM8vTE62PqDJAM%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/kajtzu%40basen.net>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230525/430a2458/attachment.html>