This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Voting for RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Voting for RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Voting for RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Evans
rhe at nosc.ja.net
Wed May 24 11:34:42 CEST 2023
Hi, > The voting procedure is “instant run-off” which clearly benefits what RIPE wants – Charging scheme A. Cards on the table: my LIR will see a substantial increase in our RIPE NCC service fees from the category-based model, but I do not believe the above is necessarily correct. To win, one of the charging schemes must get more than 50% of the vote. If we assume that more than 50% of the members want flat fee, but are evenly split between models B, C and D, then after the first round of voting, A will have 48% (say) of the votes, and the remaining 52% split between B, C and D. At that point, as nobody has > 50%, the lowest of B, C or D will be reallocated to their second preference votes. Presumably most of those will also put another category-based option as their second preference. If you want flat fee, it’s probably important to rank B, C and D according to your preference, but include all of them. If you want category-based, then obviously vote for that. :) Cheers, Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Voting for RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Voting for RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]