[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024

John

You’ve stated what you have issues with but you haven’t provided any rational argument as to why we should vote for you specifically.

Why you?
What do you bring to the table that makes you a better choice?

Regards

Michele


--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/
https://blacknight.blog/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

I have sent this email at a time that is convenient for me. I do not expect you to respond to it outside of your usual working hours.


From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of john erivona via members-discuss <members-discuss at ripe.net>
Date: Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 14:12
To: Vitalii Zubok <vit at visti.net>, Kaj Niemi <kajtzu at basen.net>, Michel Lanners <michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu>, Elvis Daniel Velea <elvis at v4escrow.net>
Cc: RIPE member discuss list <members-discuss at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024

[EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please use caution when opening attachments from unrecognised sources.
Hi guys,
I want to use this medium to beg/ ask for your nomination of me into the ripe board this time, I have already gotten some support but i would be honoured to have the support and endorsement of all my fellow LIR on ripe, the reasons why I am running this time are these:
1) Ripe NCC though claims to be a non-profit has for the past 7 years increased its billing by 35% totally ignoring the plight of small and medium LIR.
2) Ripe ignores all of the complaint of small LIR to favour big businesses.
3) LIR do not receive equal representations on Ripe,

If you nominate me, there will be no big, large, Enterprise LIR, small and medium size LIR, every LIR would be the same , no more generalised FAQ but rather every issue presented by LIR would be handled as per the LIR:

Please nominate :

John Issa Erivona
Trading as “ Intigrad Technologies”

As your right choice


Thanks guys



[Inline image]

[Inline image]



Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone<https://mail.onelink.me/107872968?pid=nativeplacement&c=Global_Acquisition_YMktg_315_Internal_EmailSignature&af_sub1=Acquisition&af_sub2=Global_YMktg&af_sub3=&af_sub4=100000604&af_sub5=EmailSignature__Static_>


On Tuesday, May 2, 2023, 2:18 pm, Vitalii Zubok <vit at visti.net> wrote:


On 28.04.2023 17:40, Kaj Niemi wrote:
> FWIW, ARIN does not seem to have a problem with charging larger
> organizations more, see
> https://www.arin.net/resources/fees/fee_schedule/
> <https://www.arin.net/resources/fees/fee_schedule/>

Thanks for this link.

Also I've noticed that in ARIN,
/20 up to and including /18  plus /32 up to and including /28
are referred as SMALL, with a fee of $2000, not $4000+ as proposed in
model A.


>
> Does anyone know whether such large orgs have more influence with ARIN?
> Referring to the mail from the EB a few days ago, EB seems to be of the
> opinion that RIPE NCC couldn't charge recipients of larger allocations
> in RIPEland more than 10k because of $factors such as "these larger
> companies would want a greater say in the organisation’s governance as a
> result of their increased contribution".
>
> While on that topic, I wonder why the EB recommends option 1 and thinks
> that the smaller organizations would not want to have a larger say in
> the organization's [RIPE's] governance as a result of their increased
> contribution.......
>
> But sure, we can compare service fees. It seems that the imaginary LIR
> with IPv4 /21 + IPv4 /22 + 1 ASN + IPv6 /32 would in America,where
> everything is huge, pay only $1000 or 908 euro annually. If you have
> other resources, you're not getting charged for the price of an ASN.
>
>
>
>
> Kaj
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net>> on behalf of
> Michel Lanners <michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu<mailto:michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu>>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 26, 2023 23:57
> *To:* Elvis Daniel Velea <elvis at v4escrow.net<mailto:elvis at v4escrow.net>>
> *Cc:* RIPE member discuss list <members-discuss at ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss at ripe.net>>
> *Subject:* Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of
> Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
> Exceptionally replying to someone in particular:
>
>> except him and the board of an RIR that needs to spend €40m/year
>> (double than the other RIRs - ARIN is at about $20m, LACNIC - $10m,
>> APNIC - $21m, only the NCC needs $45m) and increase budget with
>> 10-15%/year.
>
> It’s not fair to compare budgets. Compare membership fees. ARIN’s fees
> are for example higher or much higher, depending on service, while their
> budget is half. Apples and oranges?
>
> *Michel LANNERS*
> CIO at LU-CIX Management G.I.E.
> --
> Mail: michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu<mailto:michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu> <mailto:michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu>
> Phone: (+352) 28 99 29 92-81
> LU-CIX Management G.I.E.
> 202, Z.A.E. Wolser F
> L-3290 Bettembourg
> lu-cix.lu <https://www.lu-cix.lu/>
> luxembourg-internet-days.com <https://luxembourg-internet-days.com/>
> lunog.lu <https://www.lunog.lu/>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss at ripe.net>
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/vit%40visti.net


_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss at ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss at ripe.net>
https://mailman.ripe.net/
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/john.erivona%40yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230504/5da91281/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: IMG_0985.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 1143446 bytes
Desc: IMG_0985.PNG
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230504/5da91281/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: IMG_0986.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 1106770 bytes
Desc: IMG_0986.PNG
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230504/5da91281/attachment-0003.png>