[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Final RIPE NCC Charging Schemes for Members to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vitalii Zubok
vit at visti.net
Mon May 1 17:30:18 CEST 2023
On 28.04.2023 17:40, Kaj Niemi wrote: > FWIW, ARIN does not seem to have a problem with charging larger > organizations more, see > https://www.arin.net/resources/fees/fee_schedule/ > <https://www.arin.net/resources/fees/fee_schedule/> Thanks for this link. Also I've noticed that in ARIN, /20 up to and including /18 plus /32 up to and including /28 are referred as SMALL, with a fee of $2000, not $4000+ as proposed in model A. > > Does anyone know whether such large orgs have more influence with ARIN? > Referring to the mail from the EB a few days ago, EB seems to be of the > opinion that RIPE NCC couldn't charge recipients of larger allocations > in RIPEland more than 10k because of $factors such as "these larger > companies would want a greater say in the organisation’s governance as a > result of their increased contribution". > > While on that topic, I wonder why the EB recommends option 1 and thinks > that the smaller organizations would not want to have a larger say in > the organization's [RIPE's] governance as a result of their increased > contribution....... > > But sure, we can compare service fees. It seems that the imaginary LIR > with IPv4 /21 + IPv4 /22 + 1 ASN + IPv6 /32 would in America,where > everything is huge, pay only $1000 or 908 euro annually. If you have > other resources, you're not getting charged for the price of an ASN. > > > > > Kaj > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of > Michel Lanners <michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 26, 2023 23:57 > *To:* Elvis Daniel Velea <elvis at v4escrow.net> > *Cc:* RIPE member discuss list <members-discuss at ripe.net> > *Subject:* Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of > Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024 > Exceptionally replying to someone in particular: > >> except him and the board of an RIR that needs to spend €40m/year >> (double than the other RIRs - ARIN is at about $20m, LACNIC - $10m, >> APNIC - $21m, only the NCC needs $45m) and increase budget with >> 10-15%/year. > > It’s not fair to compare budgets. Compare membership fees. ARIN’s fees > are for example higher or much higher, depending on service, while their > budget is half. Apples and oranges? > > *Michel LANNERS* > CIO at LU-CIX Management G.I.E. > -- > Mail: michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu <mailto:michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu> > Phone: (+352) 28 99 29 92-81 > LU-CIX Management G.I.E. > 202, Z.A.E. Wolser F > L-3290 Bettembourg > lu-cix.lu <https://www.lu-cix.lu/> > luxembourg-internet-days.com <https://luxembourg-internet-days.com/> > lunog.lu <https://www.lunog.lu/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/vit%40visti.net
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Final RIPE NCC Charging Schemes for Members to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]