This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at interall.co.il
Tue Mar 28 07:15:09 CEST 2023
On 24/03/2023 18:20, i7 NOC wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > As a representative of one of the country's largest sponsoring LIRs and > IPv4 transfer brokers, I would like to express my concerns about the > proposed charging models, particularly the inclusion of transfer fees. I > believe these fees introduce a significant degree of unpredictability to > the RIPE NCC's annual budget due to the fluctuations in the number of > transfers each year, making it difficult for the organization to > maintain financial stability. Any LIR that has resources defined in the RIPE DB and who just use them does not place any sort of administrative burden on the RIPE NCC. It is specifically IP block transfers that adds administrative work on the RIPE NCC. Regards, Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]