[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024

Hi,










"For the first matter, this actual proposal. I tend to agree with model 2, except for the categories. If you are assigning points to various resources to get to a category, you might as well assign prices to that resource, and invoice those tariffs. I would expect the amount of IP’s to be in balance with the size of a member. "


I am very curious what you mean by this, do you mean that a large customer (based on higher numbers) should also pay lower rates? I hope not?




I mean that larger organisations will probably have more IPs, and thus pay more.


The price should be at least the same, preferably higher. If that bothers them, it's a nice incentive to migrate to IPv6 and dump the IPv4 on the market, which enables new organisations to start deploying as well.


-- 
Mark Schouten 
CTO, Tuxis B.V. | https://www.tuxis.nl/ 
<mark at tuxis.nl> | +31 318 200208
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230324/2be0c7bf/attachment.html>