This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New pricing proposal - it goes out of control
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at interall.co.il
Thu Mar 9 07:01:24 CET 2023
On 07/03/2023 13:29, Paul Lewis wrote: > Hi, > Regarding the two proposed charging models for 2024, I honestly think > that the pricing is a bit on the steep side. Model 1 certainly seems to > have a sharp increase. > > The 50 EUR 'per ASN' charge I imagine might be a problem for LIR members > with many ASNs. I feel that it would be better to have this charge apply > to 16-bit ASNs which are in limited supply. This could be seen as a > surcharge or penalty for holding onto legacy hardware and/or supporting > providers that do so. As for 32-bit ASNs, they could still be charged > something but I think they should be charged quite a bit less. I see no problem with 50E charge per ASN. If you have 100 ASNs you are obviously a large organization and should have no problem paying 5000E. Regards, Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New pricing proposal - it goes out of control
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]