This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] New pricing proposal - it goes out of control
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New pricing proposal - it goes out of control
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New pricing proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
sdy at a-n-t.ru
sdy at a-n-t.ru
Wed Mar 8 15:13:42 CET 2023
Hi ALL! Sorry, it can be duplicated, but it is need to say again. Any scheme with categories based on boundaries on the number of resources (IP) will be unfair! It will be dishonest, because someone has 10,000, another has 12,000, and someone has 1,000,000. You never can find right limits. In the free market, we now pay price for 1 IP and not for a "category". There are only ONE fairway - is to make payments for the REAL number of used resources (AS and subnets /24). All other ways is the expense of someone for other. You will never come up with an honest scheme with boundaries categories. But we can enter categories with coefficients for some kind of LIRs. For example 0.3 for educational institutions. To discuss new scheme and the price of AS and /24 subnet, at first, directors of RIPE NCC must give us statistics, about LIRs, they kind and numder AS and /24 subnets it gets. The payment must have two parts. One - static, for all (administrative part). Another - dynamic, for used resources (land tax). ---------------------- Sebulov Dmitriy
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New pricing proposal - it goes out of control
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New pricing proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]