This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kaj Niemi
kajtzu at basen.net
Fri Apr 28 16:40:57 CEST 2023
FWIW, ARIN does not seem to have a problem with charging larger organizations more, see https://www.arin.net/resources/fees/fee_schedule/ Does anyone know whether such large orgs have more influence with ARIN? Referring to the mail from the EB a few days ago, EB seems to be of the opinion that RIPE NCC couldn't charge recipients of larger allocations in RIPEland more than 10k because of $factors such as "these larger companies would want a greater say in the organisation’s governance as a result of their increased contribution". While on that topic, I wonder why the EB recommends option 1 and thinks that the smaller organizations would not want to have a larger say in the organization's [RIPE's] governance as a result of their increased contribution....... But sure, we can compare service fees. It seems that the imaginary LIR with IPv4 /21 + IPv4 /22 + 1 ASN + IPv6 /32 would in America, where everything is huge, pay only $1000 or 908 euro annually. If you have other resources, you're not getting charged for the price of an ASN. Kaj ________________________________ From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Michel Lanners <michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 23:57 To: Elvis Daniel Velea <elvis at v4escrow.net> Cc: RIPE member discuss list <members-discuss at ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024 Exceptionally replying to someone in particular: except him and the board of an RIR that needs to spend €40m/year (double than the other RIRs - ARIN is at about $20m, LACNIC - $10m, APNIC - $21m, only the NCC needs $45m) and increase budget with 10-15%/year. It’s not fair to compare budgets. Compare membership fees. ARIN’s fees are for example higher or much higher, depending on service, while their budget is half. Apples and oranges? Michel LANNERS CIO at LU-CIX Management G.I.E. -- Mail: michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu<mailto:michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu> Phone: (+352) 28 99 29 92-81 LU-CIX Management G.I.E. 202, Z.A.E. Wolser F L-3290 Bettembourg lu-cix.lu<https://www.lu-cix.lu/> luxembourg-internet-days.com<https://luxembourg-internet-days.com/> lunog.lu<https://www.lunog.lu/> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230428/f39904c2/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]