[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Newton
paul.newton at f4rn.org.uk
Tue Apr 25 08:12:35 CEST 2023
Thanks Randy, I realise that this criticism is simplistic, but on the other hand we resent being forced to pay for features that were are not in a position to be able to use, by having them embedded in the unavoidable fees. Current charging mechanism represents 3% of our turnover. Paul Newton F4RN On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, 03:52 Randy Bush, <randy at psg.com> wrote: > > It's beginning to look like rearranging deck chairs on the > > Titanic. Spot the odd one out (if I've gathered the data correctly) > > AFRINIC. $6m > > LACNIC. $10m > > APNIC. $22.5m > > ARIN. $24m > > RIPE NCC. €42 = $46m > > now list the services provided to operators by each. you wanna get rid > of ris, atlas, many dns services, new engineer education, ...? > > to compare you will have to fold caida's budget into arin's. oh, and > route views's too. > > this discussion sometimes reminds me of the US house of representatives > debt ceiling discussion. let's cut everything that does not benefit my > state, or fossil fuels. > > i am a ripe member because of the real services, open community, etc. > ya gets what ya pay for. tanstaafl. > > randy > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230425/ba5d9334/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]