This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clement Cavadore
ccavadore at vedege.net
Mon Apr 17 19:54:59 CEST 2023
Hello Sander, On Fri, 2023-04-14 at 23:56 +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: > So as far as I’m concerned, adding a fee per ASN is a good thing, and > maybe makes it possible to revive 2014-03 again! I do not agree with such an opinion. Since we have AS32, aut-num are not scarce resource. There is no real need to "take back" those resurces if it's unused. Therefore I would prefer to stay the way we are, at least for the ASN which are already assigned. Clément
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]